Category: Off the Charts

  • Possibly Surprising Insights on the Future of Work

    Possibly Surprising Insights on the Future of Work

    by Jim Stanford

    Share

    Trade unionists are gathering this week at the ACTU’s triennial Congress in Brisbane.  Jim Stanford, Director of the Centre for Future Work, participated in a panel on the Future of Work (an apt title!) at the Congress.

    His presentation was “5 Possibly Surprising Insights on the Future of Work”.

    More detail on the issues raised in his presentation is provided in the Centre’s recent submission to the Senate Inquiry on the Future of Work and the Future of Workers.


    Related documents



    Presentation Slides



    Factsheet

    Related research

    You might also like

    Centre For Future Work to evolve into standalone entity

    The Centre for Future Work was established by the Australia Institute in 2016 to conduct and publish progressive economic research on work, employment, and labour markets. Supported by the Australian Union movement, the centre produced cutting edge research and led the national conversation on economic issues facing working people: including the future of jobs, wages

  • Centre for Future Work at #ACTUCongress18

    Centre for Future Work at #ACTUCongress18

    by Jim Stanford

    Share

    Trade unionists from across Australia are gathering in Brisbane this week for the 2018 Congress of the Australian Council of Trade Unions. And the Centre for Future Work will be there!

    Come and check out our information booth in the exhibitors’ area: meet our staff, learn more about our work, and sign up for updates.

    Our Director Jim Stanford will be presenting as part of a session on The Future of Work (good title!), Tuesday July 17 at 2:15 pm in conference room P1.

    And we will be distributing copies of a brochure with links to some of our most recent research (attached below).

    We are glad that our research can support the campaign to #ChangeTheRules!


    Related documents



    Brochure

    Related research

    You might also like

    Commonwealth Budget 2025-2026: Our analysis

    by Fiona Macdonald

    The Centre for Future Work’s research team has analysed the Commonwealth Government’s budget, focusing on key areas for workers, working lives, and labour markets. As expected with a Federal election looming, the budget is not a horror one of austerity. However, the 2025-2026 budget is characterised by the absence of any significant initiatives. There is

  • Penalty rate cuts fail to ignite jobs boom

    Penalty rate cuts fail to ignite jobs boom

    Share

    Reduced Sunday and holiday penalty rates for retail and hospitality workers failed to ignite the boom in employment as promised by employer groups who supported the change.

    A new report from The Australia Institute’s Centre for Future Work examined employment and working hours in the retail and hospitality industries in the year since penalty rates were first cut.

    The report found, since the initial penalty rate reduction imposed by the Fair Work Commission on 1 July 2017:

    • The retail sector in particular performed very badly relative to the rest of the economy.
    • Total employment was unchanged in the year ending in May 2018, continuing a long-term trend of employment stagnation.
    • Full-time employment declined by 50,000 positions.
    • Average weekly hours of work declined by more than a full hour, and the underemployment ratio (share of workers who want more hours) grew almost 2 percentage points.
    • The hospitality sector (accommodation and food services) experienced similar results, including weak job-creation, a loss of full-time employment, shorter average hours of work, and higher underemployment.

    “Far from experiencing a jobs boom, the retail and hospitality sectors have significantly underperformed the rest of the economy in terms of both hiring and working hours,” says Dr. Jim Stanford, Director of the Centre for Future Work.

    “Most industries where penalty rates were unchanged did far better at job-creation than the two sectors where penalty rates were cut.

    “Employer representatives argued that reducing labour costs for work on Sundays and holidays would spur a big expansion in employment, one group even predicted 40,000 new jobs. Our report found that was simply not the case.

    “Based on a number of criteria, the retail and hospitality sectors performed among the worst of any Australian industries in the year since penalty rates were first cut.

    “While lower penalty rates are not the cause of the poor performance, our research certainly disproves inflated claims by employers and government that cutting labour costs would unleash a jobs boom.

    “If we really want more jobs, we should boost wages, improve job security, and strengthen purchasing power throughout the economy. Cutting penalty rates does the opposite.”


    Related research

  • Manufacturing Rebound Could Be Cut Short By Skills Shortage

    Manufacturing Rebound Could Be Cut Short By Skills Shortage

    Share

    After years of decline, Australia’s manufacturing industry is finally recovering – adding almost 50,000 jobs in the last year, one of the best job-creation records of any sector in the whole economy. But that recovery could be cut short by growing shortages of skilled workers, according to a new report on vocational training in manufacturing.

    The new report from the Centre for Future Work identifies key factors behind the rapid emergence of skills shortages in manufacturing, including:

    • The sector’s ageing workforce, creating a looming demographic transition for skilled worker
    • The highly specific nature of manufacturing skills (across sectors and occupations), creating difficulty for workers moving from between shrinking sectors to growing sectors
    • The need for new skills and ongoing training as companies adopt advanced manufacturing techniques and new digital technologies.

    “Manufacturing is again making a positive contribution to Australia’s economic progress after over a decade of decline. We don’t want to squander this potential,” said Dr. Jim Stanford, Director of the Centre for Future Work.

    “If Australia doesn’t get its act together on vocational training, this will be a wasted opportunity for manufacturing.

    “Recent experiments with market-based vocational training have been a waste, they have damaged confidence in the skills system among both potential students and employers.

    “Stable, well-funded, high-quality public institutions must be the anchors of any successful VET system.

    “Public institutions are the only ones with the resources, the connections, and the stability to provide manufacturers with a steady supply of world-class skilled workers.

    “No sector feels the pain of the failure of vocational training more than manufacturing, precisely because advanced skills are so essential for the success of advanced manufacturing techniques.

    “Manufacturing stakeholders need to work together to strengthen vocational education and training.”

    Key principles for rebuilding vocational education in manufacturing, discussed in the report, include:

    • A greater reliance on courses and apprenticeships through public-sector TAFE (rather than private providers)
    • Phased-in retirement programs to allow senior workers to pass on their skills to new apprentices
    • Inclusion of provisions guaranteeing access to further training in industry awards and enterprise agreements.

    The report was co-authored by Dr. Jim Stanford and Dr. Tanya Carney and prepared for the Second Annual National Manufacturing Summit at Parliament House on 26 June 2018.

    The National Manufacturing Summit engages leading representatives from all parts of Australian manufacturing: businesses, peak bodies, unions, universities, the financial sector, suppliers and government. The growing problem of skills shortages is a priority focus for this year’s Summit.


    Related research

  • The Dimensions of Insecure Work in Australia

    The Dimensions of Insecure Work in Australia

    by Jim Stanford

    Share

    Less than half of employed Australians now hold a “standard” job: that is, a permanent full-time paid job with leave entitlements. That’s the startling finding of a new report on the growing insecurity of work published by the Centre for Future Work.

    Share of Workers in Full-Time Paid Employment with Leave Entitlements. Source: Centre for Future Work calculations from ABS Catalogues 6291.0.55.003, EQ04 (2017), and 6333.0 Tables 2.3 and 9.1 (2012).

    The report, The Dimensions of Insecure Work: A Factbook, reviews eleven statistical indicators of the growth in employment insecurity over the last five years: including part-time work, short hours, underemployment, casual jobs, marginal self-employment, and jobs paid minimum wages under modern awards.

    All these indicators of job stability have declined since 2012, thanks to a combination of weak labour market conditions, aggressive profit strategies by employers, and passivity by labour regulators. Together, these trends have produced a situation where over 50 per cent of Australian workers now experience one or more of these dimensions of insecurity in their jobs - and less than half have access to “standard,” more secure employment.

    “Australians are rightly worried about the growing insecurity of work, especially for young people,” said Dr. Jim Stanford, one of the co-authors of the report. “Many young people are giving up hope of finding a permanent full-time job, and if these trends continue, many of them never will.”

    The report also documents the low and falling earnings received by workers in insecure jobs. While real wages for those in permanent full-time positions (the best-paid category) have grown, wages for casual workers have declined. And part-time workers in marginal self-employed positions (including so-called “gig” workers) have fared the worst: with real wages falling 26 percent in the last five years.

    “Given current labour market conditions and lax labour standards, employers are able to hire workers on a ‘just-in-time’ basis,” Dr. Stanford said. “They employ workers only when and where they are most needed, and then toss them aside. This precariousness imposes enormous risks and costs on workers, their families, and the whole economy.”

    Dr. Stanford called on policy-makers to address growing precarity with stronger rules to protect workers in insecure jobs (such as provisions for more stable schedules, and options to transition to permanent from casual work). He also stressed the need for economic policies that target the creation of permanent full-time jobs.


    Related research

    You might also like

    Centre For Future Work to evolve into standalone entity

    The Centre for Future Work was established by the Australia Institute in 2016 to conduct and publish progressive economic research on work, employment, and labour markets. Supported by the Australian Union movement, the centre produced cutting edge research and led the national conversation on economic issues facing working people: including the future of jobs, wages

  • Insecure work: The New Normal

    Insecure work: The New Normal

    by Jim Stanford

    Most Australians know in their guts that it’s pretty hard to find a traditional permanent job these days.  And now the statistics confirm it: less than half of employed Australians have one of those “standard” jobs.  And more than half experience one or more dimensions of insecurity: including part-time, irregular, casual, contractor, and marginally self-employed jobs.

    In this commentary article published originally by Ten Daily, Our Director Dr. Jim Stanford summarises the findings of the Centre’s recent report on “The Dimensions of Insecure Work.”

    If You Have A Stable Full-Time Job You’re An Endangered Species

    Ask any young job-seeker about their prospects of finding a permanent full-time job, and they won’t know whether to laugh or cry.  Sure, they might get a few hours of work here, a few hours there: piecing together disparate “gigs” in hopes of paying the rent.

    But landing a permanent full-time job with a regular salary and basic benefits (like paid holidays and superannuation)?  Dream on.

    It’s no surprise that young workers experience the insecurity of modern work most brutally: they don’t have experience, seniority, or connections to help them in their hunt.  But precarious work now affects Australians of any age, in all sectors of the economy, not just those trying to break in.  What was once considered a “standard” job – the kind where you know where and when you will work, and how much you will earn – now feels like the exception, not the rule.  And in fact, the hard numbers now confirm it: insecure work has indeed become the new normal.

    With co-author Dr. Tanya Carney, I recently assembled data on eleven different dimensions of job insecurity, based on official statistics from the Australian Bureau of Statistics and other government sources.  We considered many aspects of the problem: including the rise of part-time work, casual jobs, people working very short hours, temporary foreign workers, and workers in nominally “self-employed” positions.

    In every case, there has been a marked increase in insecurity in recent years.  A turning point was reached in 2012, as the mining investment boom (that underpinned several years of strong job conditions) turned down.  That boom, and associated macroeconomic expansion, had masked longer-run structural shifts in the nature of employment – but only for a while.  But now, since 2012, the sea-change in employment relationships is starkly visible.

    It was when we put all of these different indicators of insecurity together, that a startling conclusion became clear.  The standard “job” has been whittled away on all sides – by part-time work, by casual and temporary jobs, by shifting more tasks to supposedly independent contractors and self-employed gig workers.  And in 2017, for the first time since these statistics have been collected, the proportion of employed Australians filling a standard job fell below 50 percent.  Less than half of employed Australians now work in a permanent full-time paid position with basic entitlements (like sick pay and paid holidays).

    In other words, most employed Australians experience one or more dimensions of insecurity in their jobs.  Insecure work, once on the margins of the labour market, is now the norm.  In fact, many workers experience multiple aspects of this insecurity.

    For example, part-time marginally self-employed workers are among the most insecure of all.  They have no employees of their own; most aren’t even incorporated.  They get a tax number, and then scrabble from gig to gig – accepting outsourced work from large firms who once hired actual employees to perform these tasks.  Their incomes, low to start with, have declined a shocking 26 percent in real terms since 2012.  They now make, on average, barely one-third as much as a typical paid full-time permanent employee.

    Surprisingly, some defenders of the status quo in Australia’s labour market deny any problem with job security.  For example, Craig Laundy, Australia’s Minister for Small Business, claims insecure work is not actually more common, and defends casual work as “a completely appropriate way for many businesses and many employees to conduct their relationship.” Business lobbyists also deny work has become any less secure.

    But this flies in the face of both the official statistics, and the lived experience of millions of Australians struggling to find stable employment. And the increasing precarity of modern work in turn produces a spate of economic, social and political consequences.  Households can’t predict their future income; they also can’t make long-run financial commitments (like buying a home, supporting children through higher education, or saving for retirement).  Consumer spending and financial stability suffer, as does growth and job-creation.

    Politically, the frustration of millions of Australians about this chronic insecurity will inevitably bubble up at the polling booths.  Job insecurity has reached a tipping point, now that less than half of all employed workers fill standard permanent full-time jobs.  Sooner or later, a political tipping point will also be reached: as Australians react against the erosion of the ideal of a “fair go.”

    For this reason, hopeful politicians should be ready to present convincing ideas for restoring job stability and shared prosperity, in the lead-up to the next Commonwealth election.  Denying that there is even a problem, will not likely do the trick.

    Jim Stanford is Economist and Director of the Centre for Future Work at the Australia Institute. With Tanya Carney he is co-author of The Dimensions of Insecure Work: A Factbook.


    You might also like

    Centre For Future Work to evolve into standalone entity

    The Centre for Future Work was established by the Australia Institute in 2016 to conduct and publish progressive economic research on work, employment, and labour markets. Supported by the Australian Union movement, the centre produced cutting edge research and led the national conversation on economic issues facing working people: including the future of jobs, wages

  • For First Time, Less than Half of Workers Have a ‘Standard Job’

    For First Time, Less than Half of Workers Have a ‘Standard Job’

    Share

    For the first time on record, less than half of employed Australians hold a ‘standard job’: that is, a permanent full-time paid job with leave entitlements.

    A new report by the Centre for Future Work at the Australia Institute looks at the growing insecurity of work in Australia.

    The report reviews 11 statistical indicators of the growth in employment insecurity over the last five years, including: part-time work, short hours, underemployment, casual jobs, marginal self-employment, and jobs paid minimum wages under modern awards.

    All these indicators of job stability have declined since 2012, leading to a majority of Australian workers now experiencing one or more of these indicators of job – and less than half have access to what was once considered a ‘standard job’.

    “Australians are rightly worried about the growing insecurity of work. We are now seeing less than half of employed Australians holding a ‘standard job’, with dependable hours, pay, and benefits” said Dr. Jim Stanford, director of the Centre for Future Work.

    “In particular, many young people are giving up hope of finding a permanent full-time job – and if these trends continue, many of them never will.”

    The report also documents the low and falling earnings received by workers in insecure jobs:

    • While real wages for those in the best paid job category – permanent full-time jobs – have grown, wages for casual workers have declined.
    • Part-time workers in marginal self-employed positions (including so-called ‘gig economy’ workers) have fared the worst, with real wages falling 26 percent in the last five years.

    “Given current labour market conditions and lax labour standards, employers are able to hire workers on a ‘just-in-time’ basis, employing workers only when and where they are most needed and then tossing them aside afterwards,” said Dr Stanford.

    “This insecurity imposes enormous risks and costs on workers, their families, and the whole economy.”

    Dr. Stanford called on policy-makers to address growing job precarity with stronger rules to protect workers in insecure jobs, such as provisions for more stable schedules, and options to transition to from casual work to permanent positions. He also stressed the need for economic policies that target the creation of permanent full-time jobs.


    Related research

  • A Comprehensive and Realistic Strategy for More and Better Jobs

    A Comprehensive and Realistic Strategy for More and Better Jobs

    by Jim Stanford

    Share

    The Australian Council of Trade Unions has released a major policy paper outlining an ambitious, multi-faceted program to address the chronic shortage of work, and the steady erosion of job quality, in Australia. The full paper, Jobs You Can Count On, is available on the ACTU’s website.  It contains specific proposals to stimulate much stronger job-creation, reduce unemployment and underemployment, improve job quality (including through repairs to Australia’s industrial relations system), and ensure that all communities (including traditionally marginalised populations like indigenous peoples, women, youth, and people with disability) have full access to the decent work opportunities that the plan would generate.

    Dr. Jim Stanford, Director of the Centre for Future Work, reviewed the ACTU’s paper in detail, and prepared an evaluation of its proposals and likely effects. Stanford endorsed the policy’s complementary set of expansionary macroeconomic measures, which would strengthen every major component of aggregate demand in the national economy: including government programs, capital investment, net exports, and consumer spending. He also emphasised the importance of the paper’s vision for a stronger labour market information and planning system, which will be essential to effectively match workers with jobs as the labour market tightens.

    Stanford estimated that the ACTU’s plan, if implemented consistently over a five-year period, would be capable of achieving the following outcomes:

    • Unemployment rate falling to 4 percent or lower.
    • Share of full-time work rebounding toward 75 percent of employment (since employers will be pressured by falling unemployment to create full-time jobs).
    • Underemployment rate falling to fall to 5 percent or lower.
    • Incidence of casual work declining below 20 percent.
    • Labour force participation rising by at least 2 percentage points, especially among young workers.
    • Nominal wage growth accelerating to traditional rates of 4 percent per year.

    Read the complete ACTU paper, Jobs You Can Count On.


    Related documents



    Report review

    You might also like

  • Government Spending Power Could Support Stronger Wage Growth

    Government Spending Power Could Support Stronger Wage Growth

    Share

    Australia’s state and federal governments could help solve the problem of stagnant wages by better leveraging their own spending power.

    New research from the Centre for Future Work at The Australia Institute demonstrates a strong connection between government spending and working conditions across the economy.

    “Weak labour market conditions, including record-weak wage growth, could be improved by linking public spending in all forms to improved job quality and compensation,” said Dr. Jim Stanford, Director of the Centre for Future Work.

    The Centre for Future Work report finds three main avenues through which government spending could lift wages and working conditions:

    1. Direct work and production undertaken within government and its departments and agencies (the public sector).
    2. Arms-length service-producing organisations which depend on government funding (the non-profit sector).
    3. Private-sector firms which supply government and public agencies with goods and services (the private sector).

    “It is ironic that Treasurers are always praying for stronger wage growth with every year’s budget in order to generate stronger growth and stronger revenues. Yet governments don’t pursue obvious opportunities to actually achieve that wage growth by linking labour standards to their own expenditure policies,” said Dr Stanford.

    “This is clearly a lost opportunity. Australia’s government sector is by far the single largest part of Australia’s economy.

    “This economic footprint, if wielded consistently to achieve higher wages and better jobs, could have a powerful impact on labour market outcomes.”

    Australian government economic footprint at a glance:

    • Total expenditures of over $660 billion per year, equal to 36 percent of Australia’s GDP.
    • Expenditures on current production of public goods and services of over $330 billion per year (18.5 percent of GDP), and further spending on capital investments of over $85 billion (another 5 percent of GDP).
    • Direct public sector employment of close to 2 million workers, with millions more jobs indirectly dependent on government injections of spending power.
    • Fiscal support for public and community services by arms-length non-profit agencies, worth at least another 4 percent of GDP.
    • Goods and services procured from private-sector suppliers equivalent to around 10 percent of GDP (or about $175 billion per year).

    Related research

  • Don’t blame it on the deficit: WA

    Don’t blame it on the deficit: WA

    Share

    A report released today by the Australia Institute’s Centre for Future Work shows Western Australia’s recent budget deficit is the result – not the cause – of deteriorating economic conditions.

    Contrary to calls for fiscal austerity and public sector downsizing, being made in response to the emergence of fiscal deficits in WA, the report showed that budget deficits played a useful role in stabilizing the economy during times of economic downturn, and will automatically recede as the economy recovers.

    “In reality there should be no alarm about the WA state deficit. Deficits are acceptable, and positive, during periods of weak economic growth.” says the Australia Institute’s Senior Economist, Dr. Cameron Murray.

    “In fact, that deficit merely confirms that state fiscal policy is doing what it is supposed to: providing essential public services and providing a solid base for private-sector economic activity.”

    “It is wrong to immediately conclude that the only response to a deficit must be some combination of cutting spending, reducing public sector employment, freezing or reducing public sector wages, and selling public assets.”

    The report found public sector payrolls grew modestly through the 2014-17 period.  That modest growth, in contrast to the contraction in private payrolls, supported a cumulative total of $3 billion dollars in additional GDP; $1.3 billion in additional consumer spending; and $450 million in additional state revenues.

    “During WA’s recession we’ve seen compensation growth slow down in both the public and private sectors,” says Murray.

    “Importantly however, the modest, continuing wage growth we did see in the public sector acted as an automatic stabiliser, reducing the severity of WA’s downturn.”

    Total economic activity, including economic activity in the private sector, was also found to be higher as a result of the government slowly but steadily increasing its spending on public servants and the services they provide.

    “Those deficits arose in the wake of the slowdown in mining activity and corresponding deceleration of employment and economic growth, and over-zealous fiscal austerity is not the solution.”

    “Continuing growth in public sector wages and maintaining public spending during weak economic periods generates positive spillover effects for the rest of the economy,” says Murray.

    More recently, positive signs of recovery in the state economy are quickly and automatically producing a reduction in the size of the deficit.  The report recommends the state government focus on supporting that continuing recovery, rather than reducing the government’s own contribution to it.


    Related research