Category: COVID-19

  • A Fair Share for Australian Manufacturing

    A Fair Share for Australian Manufacturing

    Manufacturing Renewal for the Post-COVID Economy
    by Jim Stanford

    New research from the Centre for Future Work reveals that Australia ranks last among all OECD countries for manufacturing self-sufficiency. The COVID-19 pandemic has reminded Australians of the importance of being able to manufacture a full range of essential equipment and supplies; and the COVID recession has created a large economic void that a revitalised manufacturing sector could help to fill in coming years.

    This report, A Fair Share for Australian Manufacturing, describes the strategic importance of the manufacturing sector to Australia’s future prosperity, and provides an inventory of policy tools that could help rebuild the sector to a size proportional to our domestic needs for manufactured products.

    While the report documents the decline of domestic manufacturing in recent years, it also reveals the enormous potential benefits that would be generated by rebuilding manufacturing back to a size  proportional to our national needs: including $180 billion in new sales, $50 billion in additional GDP, and over 400,000 new jobs.

    Key Findings:

    • Australia ranks last in manufacturing self-sufficiency among all OECD countries. Australians use $565 billion worth of manufactures each year, however, we only produce $380 billion. Therefore, Australia produces only 68% (just over two-thirds) of what we use: less than any other OECD economy.
    • The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the strategic importance of domestic manufacturing capacity. Disruptions in global supply chains and protectionist trade policies by foreign governments have increased risks we might not be able to access essential products (like health equipment and supplies) when we need them.
    • Manufacturing is not just ‘another’ sector of the economy. For several concrete reasons, manufacturing carries a strategic importance to broader national prosperity and security.
      • Australians purchase and use more manufactured goods over time; and manufacturing output is growing around the world. Allowing domestic manufacturing to decline, while our use of manufactured products grows, undermines national economic performance.
      • Manufacturing is the most innovation-intensive sector in the whole economy. No country can be an innovation leader without a strong manufacturing base.
      • Manufactured goods account for over two-thirds of world merchandise trade. A country that cannot successfully export manufactures will be shut out of most trade.
      • Manufacturing anchors hundreds of thousands of other jobs throughout the economy, thanks to its long and complex supply chain. Billions of dollars’ worth of supplies and inputs are purchased by manufacturing facilities, supporting many other sectors of the economy.
      • Manufacturing offers high-quality jobs, full-time hours and above-average incomes. And thanks to strong productivity growth and the capacity to apply modern technology, manufacturing offers the prospect of rising incomes in the future.

    If we rebuilt a manufacturing sector that was broadly proportionate to our needs, our manufacturing industry would grow by almost 50% – generating enormous benefits in jobs, incomes, innovation and exports.



    Report summary



    Full report

    Share

  • Log of Extraordinary IR Measures During COVID-19 Shutdowns

    Log of Extraordinary IR Measures During COVID-19 Shutdowns

    by Alison Pennington

    COVID-19 containment measures have suspended large sections of the economy. Governments have committed over $220 billion in income supports to workers and firms. The $130 billion JobKeeper wage subsidy scheme is the most extensive “shock absorber” (with worrying exclusions of many casual and migrant workers). With the scheme now in place, assessment of the government’s COVID-19 measures is now shifting to implementation. This includes effects on the laws and regulations governing wages and how businesses and employees (and their unions) interact to determine the terms and conditions of employment.

    Despite enduring a heightened anti-union agenda, unions (headed up by ACTU) liaised early with government to secure the JobKeeper wage subsidy to prevent mass layoffs. Unions have negotiated with industry to adapt Awards and enterprise agreements (EAs) to new business conditions. The Coalition government has proceeded with significant changes to the Fair Work Act that could hamper efforts to drive an inclusive economic and labour market recovery. What’s more, the Morrison government has indicated it will continue its pre-COVID agenda to further weaken representation rights and minimum labour laws.

    To inform assessment of the impacts of COVID-19 on jobs, wages, and workplace protections, we have summarised major developments within the industrial relations system since March 2020. The log traces revisions to Awards, enterprise agreement-making rules, new instruments formed between unions and industry, major decisions by the Fair Work Commission, and ongoing lobbying efforts by business to weaken minimum labour laws. Links to relevant research from Centre for Future Work released during the crisis, or prior to, are provided. All log entries are reported in the industrial relations publication Workplace Express. Links to other media outlets are provided where relevant.

    If there are any major IR developments that we have not reported here please get in touch at futurework@tai.org.au.

    Thursday 17 September

    • The Fair Work Commission rejects a union application for a $5 per hour “COVID-19 care allowance” for disability workers attending to clients quarantining with COVID-19. While the FWC acknowledged that disability workers were more at risk of having to take paid or unpaid leave to self-isolate, they considered the circumstances in which the allowance would be paid “rare and temporary”, while also presenting an undue cost burden on employers dealing with real or potential COVID outbreaks. The Commission also noted concern that the decision would trigger further litigation, leading to “pressure for a flow-on to other employees and awards” to other sectors with the same circumstances including in hospital care, aged care, home care and crisis accommodation.

    Thursday 3 September

    • New legislation introduced by Morrison government granting more flexibility for parents of young children to vary how they use their 12 months’ unpaid parental leave under the National Employment Standards (NES). The NES entitlement presently requires 12 months unpaid leave to be used in one continuous period (with the employee forfeiting any unused leave if returning to work before 12 months is up). Under the proposed changes, all parents (primary and secondary carers) will be able to access 30 days of flexible unpaid leave of their 12 months’ quota, subject to agreement by their employer about how the leave can be used (e.g. reduced hours, single days, groups of days, or one single block). Primary carers currently eligible under the government’s parental leave scheme will be able to claim the minimum-wage parental leave payment from Services Australia for their 30 days of flexible unpaid parental leave ($753.80 per week). The proposed laws also provide for 12 months of unpaid parental leave for families who have experienced stillbirths, infant deaths and premature births.

    Wednesday 26 July

    • Morrison government introduces JobKeeper V2.0 legislation. The Bill establishes a new two-tiered JobKeeper payment scheme and an additional revenue test that expands access to JobKeeper-enabled exemptions to the Fair Work Act (FW Act) for employers no longer eligible for the wage subsidy. The emergency FW Act measures were introduced in April for businesses receiving JobKeeper, allowing employers to change workers’ hours, duties, days, and location of work, and direct employees to take annual leave. The new Bill allows businesses that fail the existing 30% revenue decline test to apply for FW Act exemptions under a new 10% revenue decline test to determine whether they’re still “distressed”. Employees in businesses that qualify for the revised revenue test for JobKeeper-branded FW Act exemptions can have their hours reduced by up to 40%, with worrying implications for large reductions in employee incomes. The legislation states that employers cannot require staff to work less than two hours a day, and must provide seven days’ written notice before a JobKeeper-enabling direction is given. The Bill adds that employers cannot unreasonably target certain categories of workers for hours reductions, compared with other employees also subject to the directions.
    • The new two-tiered JobKeeper payment replaces the flat $1,500/fortnight rate with $1,200/fortnight for employees who worked full-time prior to the pandemic (in February), and $750/fortnight for employees working less than 20 hours. From January 2021, payments will reduce again to $1,000 and $650, respectively. The scheme will be extended to March 2021.

    Monday 27 July

    • As COVID cases surge in Victoria’s aged care sector, the Fair Work Commission approves an application for two weeks paid pandemic leave for healthcare and social services workers required to self-isolate for coronavirus. The Commission originally adjourned the application on 8 July due to concerns the leave entitlement would cause private aged care providers financial difficulty. The new COVID-era paid leave entitlement expires in three months and applies to full-time and part-time workers, but only casual workers with “regular and systematic shifts”.

    Tuesday 21 July

    • Morrison government reveals JobKeeper wage subsidy payments will be reduced from late-September under a new two-tiered system paying $1,200 for employees who worked full-time prior to the pandemic, and $750 for those working less than 20 hours in February. In January 2021, payments will reduce again to $1,000 and $650, respectively. Employers must continue to meet turnover tests to be eligible for the scheme which will be extended to March 2021.
    • The federal government announces the JobSeeker coronavirus supplement will be reduced from $550 a fortnight to $250 per fortnight, extended only until December 2021. The $300 cut to the supplement coincides with an increase in the income-free threshold for JobSeeker payments from $106 per fortnight to $300 per fortnight. Means-testing and mutual obligations will be reintroduced on 4 August.
    • Cuts to the JobKeeper and JobSeeker programs will reduce government spending by $10 billion per month and reduce the number of employees covered by the wage subsidy by over 2 million by December. Research released by The Australia Institute shows cuts to JobSeeker will plunge 370,000 people into poverty, including 80,000 children.

    Friday 17 July

    • Prime Minister Scott Morrison announces intention to extend JobKeeper exemptions to the Fair Work Act for employers no longer receiving JobKeeper. The COVID-era exemptions were introduced in April for a period of 6 months and allow employers to change workers’ hours, duties, days, and location of work, and direct employees to take annual leave. Extension of JobKeeper FW Act provisions would allow businesses no longer receiving JobKeeper to continue operations with all relevant Awards, enterprise agreements, individual contracts or transitional instruments suspended (though hourly rates of pay under the prevailing pay instruments remain in place).

    Wednesday 8 July

    • In a major decision with concerning public health consequences, the Fair Work Commission adjourns a union application to introduce a paid pandemic leave entitlement for Award-covered healthcare and community services workers required to self-isolate during coronavirus crisis. The Commission contended the COVID-era paid leave provision would undermine financial security of private aged care and NDIS providers.

    Wednesday 1 July

    • Fair Work Commission extends temporary COVID-19 variations made to the fast food, retail, health industry, clerks, hospitality and vehicle maintenance awards in late-March. The flexibility schedules broadly allow employers to deploy workers across classifications, direct employees to take annual leave, and reduce minimum hours requirements. The Clerks Award variation enabling employers to spread out employee working hours without paying penalty rates were opposed by the ASU but the FWC granted the extension until September 27.
    • FWC extends unpaid pandemic leave provisions until further order for health professionals, nurses, aged care, pharmacy and ambulance awards. Other awards granted extensions until defined cut-off dates include fast food, retail, and hair and beauty (July 31), and airline pilots (December).

    Thursday 11 June

    • The Morrison government announces intention to withdraw the regulation introduced in April enabling employers to reduce the period of notice they give employees of proposed changes to EAs from seven days to one. IR Minister Christian Porter stated that the regulation introduced to support employers to rapidly respond to COVID19 disruptions to business was no longer needed.
    • Senate approves Labor proposal to discharge the Ensuring Integrity Bill.

    Tuesday 26 May

    • Morrison announces five working groups of business representatives and unions will be assembled to create a new workplace relations deal by September. The working groups will cover five key areas: award simplification, enterprise agreement making, casual and fixed-term employment, greenfields projects, and compliance and enforcement in areas including wage theft. Morrison also announces withdrawal of the Ensuring Integrity Bill from its second vote in the Senate.

    Wednesday 20 May

    • A full Federal Court rules that a coal miner employed as a casual under six consecutive contracts over almost four years is an employee entitled to leave benefits. The decision exposes employers to annual leave backpay claims for approximately 1.6 million casuals working on a regular, predictable basis.
    • FWC approves AiG application to vary the Fast Food Industry Award covering over 200,000 fast food workers to mitigate impacts of COVID-19 on employees and businesses. The variation approved by the SDA and ACTU (and contested by RAFWUU) allows employers to cut part-time workers’ hours with reduced overtime penalties, amend rosters, and request employees take annual leave which they cannot “unreasonably” refuse.

    Tuesday 19 May

    • Australian Industry Group release post-COVID-19 IR proposals for enterprise agreement-making, limiting Award content, and expanding casual employment. AiG propose to abolish the Better Off Overall Test (that requires employees covered by an EA to not fall below terms and conditions outlined in Awards), replaced by the weaker No Disadvantage Test, and weakening scrutiny of non-union EAs by the FWC, unions and employees. Award content would be drastically reduced under AiG’s proposals to remove annual leave, personal/carer’s leave, redundancy pay and public holiday loadings from Awards. Other Award derogation proposals include the expansion of Individual Flexibility Agreements (a revitalised form of the Australian Workplace Agreement implemented under WorkChoices by John Howard), and annualised salary clauses. Contrary to “fresh” branding, these proposals were developed long-before the pandemic struck. We documented the enterprise bargaining proposals from AiG and other business lobbyists in October 2019.

    Monday 18 May

    • Federal Court rules in favour of Qantas claim that it is not required to pay sick leave, carers’ leave and compassionate leave to the thousands of Qantas workers stood down due to coronavirus. Court considers entitlements forms of income protection that are extinguished when workers are not in receipt of income.

    Thursday 14 May

    • Federal government announces intention to limit the life of enterprise agreements varied using the shortened access period to 12 months. IR Minister Christian Porter said government intends to introduce the regulation through agreement with the Governor-General. On April 16, the government reduced the access period employers are required to consult with employees on changes to EAs from seven days to one.

    Friday 15 May

    • FWC flag that wages paid by distressed companies signed up to Job-Keeper could be frozen as part of the Commission’s Minimum Wage Review decision. The Commission will hand down its decision by June 30.

    Wednesday 13 May

    • The FWC hands down the first published ruling in the JobKeeper dispute jurisdiction, ruling a part-time employee unreasonably refused an employer’s request to use up one day annual leave each week for 16 weeks. The employee argued the wage subsidy was not intended to be used to offset employers’ annual leave obligations, but the case was unsuccessful.

    Friday 1 May

    • Federal government modifies JobKeeper eligibility rules to exclude workers employed by corporations owned by foreign governments. This exclusion applies to all workers including Australian residents.

    Monday 27 April

    • FWC approves joint employer-union application to vary Educational Services (Schools) General Staff Award covering non-teaching staff in non-government schools (bus drivers, maintenance workers, and others). For workers otherwise stood down due to school operations ceasing, the variation allows employers to cut hours by 25%, and redeploy workers across classifications (similar to hospitality and clerks Award variations).

    Friday 24 April

    • Business lobby groups propose changes to the enterprise bargaining system as key economic recovery measure. The proposals to increase employer unilateral power setting terms and conditions of work in EAs were prefaced pre-crisis (documented by Alison Pennington here) and include: removal of Better Off Overall Test, introduction of “whole of life” greenfields agreements, and less scrutiny of non-union EAs.

    Wednesday April 22

    • Government announces intention to reintroduce the Ensuring Integrity (EI) Bill (defeated in the Senate in December 2019). The anti-union Bill would allow the federal court to disqualify union officials, place unions under court administration, and deregister unions altogether. The Bill would also empower the FWC to prohibit union mergers on “public interest” grounds (See Jim Stanford’s submission on EI).

    Monday 20 April

    • Major law firms seek variation to the Legal Services Award mirroring previously agreed changes to the Clerks Award. Changes allow employers to provide workers of 24 hours’ notice of a vote to reduce working hours by 25%, give directives to use annual leave (beyond two weeks), reduce the minimum hours per shift for part-time and casual workers from three hours minimum to two hours, and widen ordinary weekly hours.
    • Australian Tax Office issues updates JobKeeper advice to employers clarifying the “one in, all in” rule. “You cannot choose to nominate only some employees.”

    Sunday 19 April

    • Australian Mines and Metals Association (AMMA) launch second call to abolish all Awards and all enterprise agreements (EAs) for a period of 6 months due to impacts of coronavirus on business activity.

    Thursday 16 April

    • Federal government drastically weaken representation rights under the Fair Work Act, reducing the access period employers are required to consult with employees on changes to EAs from seven days to one. Employer instruments to change hours and pay hitherto were only available to those qualifying for JobKeeper. These FW Act changes are accessible to all employers covered by EAs (including those in no danger of business failure).

    Wednesday 15 April

    • NSW Industrial Relations Commission approves a “splinter Award” covering NSW local government workers (who are ineligible for JobKeeper as state public sector workers) in the first instance of new union-employer Award-making during the pandemic. Covering over 100 councils, the Award requires councils find alternate work for worker redeployment. Those who cannot be redeployed receive a retention allowance of $858.20 per week for a period of 13 weeks. The Award provides a new Special Leave entitlement of four weeks at normal pay to cover any period where no suitable work can be provided (including self-isolation due to contracting COVID-19).

    Tuesday 14 April

    • FWC approves an employer application from Melbourne-based Mason Architectural Joinery to cut redundancy pay – the first redundancy pay entitlement cut by the Commission during the pandemic.
    • The Commission rules against an employer application to reduce the redundancy pay for three manufacturing workers on the same day. Cash flow problems were deemed an insufficient excuse since the company “has both the means to pay the full amount of the redundancy entitlement[s]. . . and the money in the bank to do so”.

    Thursday 9 April

    • Government announces pay freeze for hundreds of thousands of Commonwealth public sector workers. The pay increase deferral is stipulated by determination from April 14 for a period of 12-months. CFW release a report one week later assessing the negative impacts of public sector wage freezes on workers’ incomes and economic recovery post-pandemic.
    • JobKeeper wage subsidy legislation passes Parliament.

    Wednesday 8 April

    • FWC introduce two weeks’ unpaid pandemic leave to Award-covered workers required to self-isolate. The entitlement is available to workers who cannot access other leave entitlements and is inserted into 103 modern Awards, covering around half of all private sector workers (or 4.4 million workers). Awards were selected by the FWC based on a combination of factors including industries most affected by COVID-19, and industries with high proportions of Award-reliant workers and small and medium businesses.
    • In a worrying sign the FWC will permit enterprise bargaining to unravel due to COVID-19, UWU lose their bargaining order application with large food manufacturer Baida after the company refused to continue EA negotiations, proceeding to present the same EA deal to employees previously voted down. The FWC agreed with employer claims that it was too difficult to host negotiations due to virus social distancing requirements.

    Tuesday 7 April

    • Government introduces $130 billion JobKeeper wage subsidy scheme delivering payment of $1,500 per fortnight for a period of 6 months to employees within businesses who have experienced a 30% revenue decline compared to this time last year (less than $1 billion turnover). Registered charities with 15% revenue decline qualify for the scheme. Only Australian citizens (NZ included), employees in full-time or part-time roles, casual roles where an employee has been with the same employer for at least 12 months, and self-employed workers with ABNs are eligible for the subsidy.
    • Morrison government seek substantial changes to standard operation of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act). Government and ACTU reach agreement allowing eligible employers to lawfully change workers’ hours, duties, days and location, and force employees to use annual leave (with two weeks’ “buffer” leave remaining) for period of 6 months. Limited safeguards are introduced with the FWC empowered to adjudicate disputes. No additional funding for the FWC to deal with disputes has been announced. These changes were implemented through entirely new provisions in the FW Act (Parts 6-4C in The Coronavirus Economic Response Package Omnibus (Measures No. 2) Act 2020) that suspend operation of all relevant Awards, enterprise agreements, individual contracts or transitional instruments applicable to employers covered by JobKeeper for a period of six months. The new JobKeeper provisions in the FW Act state:
      • Employers must pay all eligible employees an amount of at least $1,500 per fortnight. Employers are required to pay all wages earned above the JobKeeper threshold to employees who performed work in the period.
      • New employer powers to decrease employee hours, and change duties and location of work. These “JobKeeper enabling directions” allow employers to amend hours of work to “match” the subsidy rate (though hourly rates of pay under the prevailing pay instruments do not change). All directions must be provided in writing, reasonable in the circumstances, delivered with three days’ notice to the employee, and be necessary to the continued employment of the worker.
      • Employers may request that employees agree to alter the days and times that they work, provided the employees’ duties are safe (including with protection from COVID-19), and within the scope of the business’ operations. Employers can also request workers take annual leave, provided they maintain a two-week annual leave balance. Changes to work days and times, and request to use annual leave must be by agreement with employees, but an employee may not “unreasonably refuse”.
    • The Centre for Future Work release early analysis of the pros and cons of JobKeeper, including polling from the Australia Institute showing 81% of respondents support extending the wage subsidy to all casual workers.

    Thursday 2 April

    • The FWC full bench approves the first application by an employer to suspend wage rises payable under the EA due to impacts of COVID-19 on future business revenue. The FWC approve the application from Queensland-based electrical services to withhold a 3% pay rise due to predicted (but not yet realised) revenue decline. The FWC hold powers to change EAs so long as employees remain better off overall than the Award. An additional untested provision allows the FWC to approve EA changes that provide for below-Award conditions in “exceptional circumstances”.
    • Council of Small Business call for suspension of unfair dismissal claims during COVID-19. Joining the Australian Mines and Metals Association, the Council also call on government to suspend all Awards and enterprise agreements for up to six months.

    Tuesday 1 April

    • Restaurant employers apply to vary the restaurants Award with consent of ACTU and UWU. Employers apply for the same hours, leave and location variations made to the Award for clerical and hotels workers on 26 and 24 March.

    Monday 30 March

    • FWC approves UWU ballot for industrial action at RSEA – a manufacturer of personal protective equipment – after the company applied to freeze bargaining for a new agreement till July. The company claimed the industrial action ballot should not be approved due to their “essential business” status and inability to bargain within an unpredictable economic climate.

    Thursday 26 March

    • FWC approves application from Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry and AiG for a three-month variation to the Clerks Award covering approximately 1.3 million administrative workers. Changes allow employers to reduce minimum hours, allow work across classifications, direct employees to take leave, and provide leave at half pay. The application mirrors amendments made to the hospitality Award on 24 March.
    • NSW parliament passes legislation allowing early access to long service leave entitlements for period of 6 months. Amendments to the Long Services Leave Act 1955 will allows employees to use accrued long-service leave in shorter time periods (such as one day per week), with less notice by agreement with their employer.

    Tuesday 24 March

    • FWC approves joint union–employer application to vary the hospitality Award. The joint Australian Hotels Association and United Workers Union amendment inserts a flexibility schedule expiring in three months. Changes allow employers to deploy workers across classifications, direct employees to take annual leave with 24 hrs notice, and reduce minimum hours requirements – full-time employees entitled to 22.8 to 38 hours per week, part-time employees to 60% of guarantees minimum hours.

    Share

  • Working From Home: Opportunities and Risks

    Working From Home: Opportunities and Risks

    by Alison Pennington and Jim Stanford

    With many regular workplaces shut down to ‘flatten the curve’ of COVID-19, millions of Australians are now shifting their work to home. Home work has great potential to cushion the economic blow of the pandemic: allowing many to keep working and earning an income, and many firms and industries to continue at least partial production. But there are also many challenges and risks associated with this major shift in work patterns. Much of the increase in home work will likely become permanent, even after the immediate health emergency passes. That makes it crucial to ‘get home work right’: providing home workers with appropriate support and protections, and preventing abuse and exploitation as home work becomes more common.

    This new Briefing Paper from the Centre for Future Work, written by Alison Pennington and Jim Stanford, surveys the scope of home work, considers its impacts on economic and gender inequality, and proposes several policy recommendations to make home work safer and fairer.

    Main findings of the Briefing Paper include:

    • About 30% of Australian jobs could conceivably be performed from home – but it will take time for workplaces to make necessary organisational and technological adjustments to reach that potential.
    • Occupations which can work from home were already paid about 25% more than occupations which cannot be shifted to remote locations. The shift to home work could therefore exacerbate income inequality; this reinforces the need for comprehensive income protections for those who cannot work from home.
    • The expansion of work-from-home arrangements raises several concerns regarding the conditions of home work, and protecting those who perform it. These include fair compensation for extra expenses associated with home work; applying normal rules regarding working hours and pay; ensuring a safe home work environment (including its social and familial context, with challenges like domestic violence); and protecting the privacy of home workers from undue monitoring and surveillance by employers.

    The paper concludes by urging researchers, unions, regulators and policy-makers to pay top-priority attention to ensuring the safety and fairness of home work – because this shift is clearly here to stay.



    Full report

    Share

  • The Same Mistake Twice

    The Same Mistake Twice

    The Self-Defeating Consequences of Public Sector Pay Freezes
    by Troy Henderson and Jim Stanford

    New research from the Australia Institute’s Centre for Future Work reveals the consequences of freezing public service pay, both for public sector workers and for the broader economy.

    Governments are devoting unprecedented resources to protecting Australians against the health and economic effects of the pandemic, but a contradictory push to adopt fiscal austerity measures is also becoming apparent. Leaders of governments at all levels — federal, state and local council — have already announced plans to freeze wages and cancel previously agreed pay raises for public servants.



    Full report

    Share

  • Catalogue of International Initiatives to Support Workers through COVID-19

    Catalogue of International Initiatives to Support Workers through COVID-19

    The Australian government has pushed back against introducing needed measures to support workers in casual, self-employed, or gig positions during the unprecedented labour market turmoil resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. Other countries, however, are moving quickly with unprecedented measures to support jobs and incomes for all workers – including those in non-standard employment – to ensure they can take necessary time away from work, and do not lose their livelihoods as a result of the virus. We have assembled a catalogue of international initiatives aimed at achieving these dual outcomes.


    Update January 2021: Further JobKeeper and JobSeeker supports have been withdrawn. As of 4 Jan 2021, the JobKeeper subsidy is now at a maximum of $1000 per fortnight until 28 March 2021. The JobSeeker coronavirus supplement has been reduced to $150 per fortnight until 31 March 2021. We are concerned that the government is withdrawing supports too fast and too soon, especially as intermittent outbreaks of the COVID-19 virus, and concomitant lockdowns, continue in various Australian states.

    We have added further information on the US response.

    Update September 2020: The JobKeeper subsidy has been extended from 28 September 2020 to 28 March 2021, at incrementally lower rates as this period continues. In brief, the JobKeeper wage subsidy will continue until March next year, but payments will fall from $1500 to $1200 a fortnight after September (or $750 for those working less than 20 hours per week). The JobSeeker coronavirus supplement will continue until December but fall from $550 to $250 a fortnight, meaning people on the program will receive $815 a fortnight after September.

    The Commonwealth is providing $1500 of paid pandemic leave in Victoria, New South Wales, Western Australia, and Tasmania for workers who need to self-isolate either because they are suffering from the virus or because they are caring from someone who is. At this stage, other states and territories have not signed onto this agreement.

    We have added further information on the UK’s response.

    Update July 2020: Governments around the world continue to take extraordinary measures to contain the economic damage associated with COVID-19. The Australian government has flagged that it will end the JobKeeper wage subsidy and the JobSeeker COVID subsidy (essentially doubling the unemployment benefit) in September, and has already done so for childcare, with negative on-effects for both a particularly feminised workforce and for working women more broadly. Given that economic conditions continue to worsen despite the government’s efforts thus far, it is hard to see how ending JobKeeper across the board would be either politically or economically feasible. In contrast, internationally, governments are expanding economic measures, including those specifically aimed at young workers.

    Update March 2020: The Australian government announced a massive $130 billion wage subsidy program, to catch up with similar schemes that have been implemented in other countries (described in detail below). This is a welcome development, attributable largely to the advocacy of the ACTU and its affiliated unions. However, there are several weaknesses in the design of the scheme – most acutely, the fact that it excludes over 2 million short-tenure casual workers and foreign visa workers. Watch this site for a more detailed analysis of the pro’s and con’s of the government’s package. And we will continue to update the catalogue below with relevant developments from other countries as the world continues to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic.


    Catalogue of International COVID-19 Labour Market Responses

    Australia Hong Kong New Zealand UK
    Canada Ireland Norway USA
    Denmark Italy South Korea  
    France Japan Spain  
    Germany Netherlands Sweden  

    The COVID-19 pandemic poses unprecedented risks to economies and societies around the world: both health risks and economic risks. Because of the urgent medical advice to social distance, and isolate people who may have been infected by or exposed to the virus, normal working patterns are being disrupted for tens of millions of workers. And with so many people unable to work and produce, GDP and incomes are collapsing around us in real time.

    Most governments are recognising the incredible urgency of this situation and moving quickly to provide emergency supports for workers, households, and the economy. A top priority in this regard must be aligning social and labour policy with medical directions to isolate infected and potentially infected workers. In this task, we suddenly confront the painful reality of the modern precarious labour market – which has outdated many of our traditional income support and insurance protections.

    Our research indicates that in Australia today less than half of all employed people hold a ‘standard’ permanent full-time waged job with normal entitlements. All others experience one or more dimensions of precarity: part-time hours, temporary or casual status, or various forms of self-employment (most of which are very insecure). Casual and self-employed workers receive no sick pay; many part-time workers do not have effective protection (since their hours are often irregular); and even permanent full-time workers may have already used some or all of their entitlement. With sick pay thus unavailable for a large and growing share of the workforce, there is great risk that individuals will be forced to choose between earning money to buy food and pay rent, and heeding the public health advice to isolate themselves as needed.

    Apart from increasing Newstart and waiving a waiting period for Newstart sickness benefits, the Australian government has provided no support for the one million casual workers of less than 12 months job tenure who do not qualify for normal paid sick leave or the new JobKeeper allowance. A further one million migrant workers are ineligible for either JobKeeper or social security payments.

    The Attorney-General even suggested that casual workers have somehow already “made provisions” for income disruptions by setting aside funds for an emergency such as this one. And leading business lobbyists have claimed that casual workers already in fact receive sick pay (via their supposedly higher hourly wages). These responses are far-fetched and dangerous. Ignoring the financial stress of casual and migrant workers in this moment enhances the risk that they may continue to perform their jobs when they should be at home, risking further spread of the virus to colleagues and customers.

    In June 2020, the government supplemented its existing JobKeeper and and JobSeeker measures with HomeBuilder, which provides eligible owner-occupiers (including first home buyers) with a grant of $25,000 to build a new home or substantially renovate an existing home. Given the income cap associated with the measure ($125,000pa for an individual applicant or $200,000pa for a couple), in combination with the high threshold for the size of the build or renovation ($150,000), it is not clear that uptake of the program will be high. Even if take-up of the grant is as high as the government estimates, the estimated $680 million budget impact pales into insignificance against the total economic hit Australia has sustained, and the other measures the government has put into place.

    In July 2020, the government announced that it would pay a one-off $750 payment to Australians receiving certain government allowances. Although this is timely and targeted at Australians with the greatest propensity to spend rather than save, it is too small to make an ongoing, systemic difference to the recovery. Economists argue that to restore consumer confidence, Australia needs more certainty about the broader shape of the economic recovery.

    Countries around the world continue to take extraordinary steps to protect workers, support incomes, and ensure that benefits are provided to the large numbers of non-standard workers who now constitute such a large part of the labour market. To inform the continuing policy debate in Australia, we have gathered summary information (and links for further information) on just some of these measures from other countries. So we can keep this catalogue up to date, please forward further suggestions and links to futurework@tai.org.au. Here we focus on measures affecting job and income security for workers and working-class households, rather than other measures (such as loan guarantees and liquidity measures implemented by governments and central banks) also aimed at offsetting the devastating impact of the pandemic on world economies.

    Canada

    The Canadian federal government will pay a 75% direct wage subsidy to businesses and non-profit employers of any size, for workers who will be kept on the payroll (whether actively working or not). The subsidy applies to wages up to $58,700 per year (125% of median wages) is capped, providing a maximum weekly subsidy of $847. The government earlier announced a new income support program for workers affected by the pandemic: the Canadian Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) will pay up to 4 months of benefit at $2000 per month to any workers (permanent, temporary and casual, self-employed, or gig workers) required to self-isolate, care for someone who is ill, care for children while schools are closed, or who lose their jobs for economic reasons during the pandemic but do not qualify for normal Employment Insurance (update: as of June 2020, CERB has been extended for two more months, with the government noting that there are far more unemployed and willing workers than there are job opportunities). The program has replaced traditional Employment Insurance for those who are not currently receiving EI benefits; the EI system became overwhelmed by applications, leading the government to move to this alternative system, delivered through the income tax administration, including on-line processing ability. The government is also boosting payments for GST credits and child benefits, deferring student loan repayments, and deferring income tax filing by four months.

    Denmark

    Denmark’s strong centralised tripartite industrial relations system has allowed that country to quickly implement a novel and powerful response to the labour market effects of the pandemic. The program was reached through agreement between the government, unions, and employer associations… perhaps like a “COVID-19 Accord,” to use an Australian analogy. For up to 3 months, the government will cover up to 75% of the wage costs of salaried workers, and 90% for hourly employees, up to 26,000 kroner ($6500A) per month. It applies to any company that otherwise would make redundant 30% or more of its staff, or at least 50 people. Some casual and contract workers are covered, but not self-employed. Employers cover the other 25% of wages; workers agree to use 5 days of annual leave during the subsidised period. The budget for the plan estimates that 2.5% of private sector workers will be covered by it, but there is no ceiling on the number.

    France

    The government has announced many far-reaching measures, including paying French workers temporarily laid off by their employers due to the coronavirus crisis a “partial unemployment benefit” equal to 84% of their wages, and employers are obliged to keep their jobs open for them.

    Additionally, France has announced a moratorium on household mortgage, utility, rent and credit card payments, and an open-ended pledge that no company will be allowed to go bankrupt during the crisis. Social security contributions by workers and employers are reduced by €35 billion. Unemployment benefits are now available to people whose hours have been cut (but are still working part-time), costing another €8.5 billion. A special “solidarity fund” will pay benefits to self-employed workers and shop-keepers. The government has indicated it is prepared to nationalise major companies facing potential bankruptcy during the downturn, to keep them in business and protect jobs.

    Germany

    Europe’s industrial heartland also pledged unlimited financial support to prevent any company from going bankrupt during the crisis. Employers will pay full salary during the first 6 weeks of absence from work, compensated by government; after that, compensation is paid according to existing sick pay schedules. Government compensation will also be paid directly to self-employed and freelancers based on their declared income in the previous year. Under Germany’s powerful short-time working allowance, hours are reduced, and employers pay for time actually worked at normal rates; the government then tops up the total income to 60% of after-tax levels (67% for workers who are parents). This allows companies to maintain full staff complements, even while reducing hours to offset a downturn in business activity.

    Hong Kong

    A cash subsidy of $10,000HK (about $2200A) is paid to every adult resident. People in public housing (which makes up most of Hong Kong’s residences) receive one month of free rent. One extra month of old age and disability benefits is paid. Home buyers, students, and small businesses also received support, in an overall aid package worth over 4% of GDP.

    Ireland

    The government will directly pay 70% of wages for workers who would otherwise be made redundant, at any business experiencing a revenue decline of 25% or more. The scheme replaces wages up to €410 per week. The government also reformed sick pay, illness benefits, and supplementary unemployment benefits to cover all workers (including self-employed) for the length of the health crisis, so that workers of any status can follow medical advice to self-isolate or care for others. A new Pandemic Unemployment Support Payment is made available to all workers (including self-employed) who lose all work due to the crisis (whether for their own health reasons, or economic impacts). Up to €350 per week will be paid for up to 12 weeks; there is a simple 1-page form to apply, and no waiting period. The former 6-day waiting period for Illness Benefits is waived, and the maximum benefit is raised to €305 per week for 2 weeks. Short-time Work Support can be paid (for up to 234 days) to workers whose hours have been reduced (to 3 days per week or less), paying up to €81.20 per day not worked.

    Italy

    Hard-hit Italy has introduced far-reaching measures based on tripartite agreements between the government, unions, and industrialists, to reduce job loss and support wages. Sick leave is paid to any workers who lose work because of illness, or closure of their workplace due to health concerns (the first 3 days covered by the employer, and then after that by the government). €1000 per month will be provided to any workers who lose their jobs because of the crisis; there is also a €500 per month payment to self-employed workers and freelancers. Mortgage payments have been suspended. The government, unions and employers have also negotiated special safety measures for workers, to maintain production and distribution of essential supplies.

    Japan

    As part of its emergency response to the growing COVID-19 crisis, the Japanese government intends to give most businesses tax breaks, including property tax reductions, tax deferments, and the ability to carry back losses.

    On April 7 Japan declared a state of emergency, announcing a raft of health and safety measures to help slow the spread of COVID-19 in Japan. To help offset the negative effects that those measures will have on economic activity, Abe also announced an economic package worth ¥108 trillion (about $998 billion), equivalent to 20 percent of the country’s GDP. The package would provide ¥2 million to small and medium-size enterprises and “relatively larger corporations,” and ¥1 million to individual business owners.

    Netherlands

    The government will pay wages for workers at businesses which experience falling revenues as a result of the pandemic. The proportion of wages covered varies with the intensity of firms’ revenue losses. Maximum wage payment is 90% of pre-pandemic wage levels. The program replaces the previous short-time work plan, and will last for 3 months (with a 3-month extension if needed). Benefits are retroactive to 1 March. Firms will immediately receive 80% of their estimated compensation upon application; adjustments (as needed) will be made after inspection of submitted documentation. The program also applies to freelance workers.

    New Zealand

    The government support package is worth over $12 billion (NZ), or 4% of New Zealand’s GDP. Close to half the value is for immediate wage subsidies for businesses to prevent redundancies: $585(NZ) per week per full-time worker, for up to 12 weeks. Similar weekly benefits ($585/week for full-time workers, $350 for part-time) will be paid for anyone (including contractors and self-employed) forced into self-isolation or to care for others, for up to 8 weeks. $3 billion is for additional targeted aid for lower-income households, including seniors, and a permanent increase in an energy subsidy. Close to $500 million is allocated to supporting immediate health responses.

    Norway

    The government removed the three-day waiting period for unemployment benefits; it also committed to continue paying salaries of workers who would otherwise face short-term redundancies. Companies can defer forwarding payroll tax to the government, to supplement cash flow during the downturn. The government is also offering 100 billion krone (over 10% of GDP) in loans and guarantees for business lending and bond issues (split half-and-half between smaller and large companies).

    South Korea

    In South Korea, when employers cease operations and make workers redundant, they are legally required to make redundancy payments equal to at least 70% of workers’ previous wages. But with the scale of shutdowns happening now, the government will step in to make those payments instead: covering 70% of wages up to ₩130,000 ($A185) per day. Applications for the subsidy have been being accepted since 17 February. The program can also be utilised to subsidise paid leave for workers in the event of temporary stand-downs: again, the government pays the first ₩130,000 ($A185) per day, and the employer pays the remainder.

    Spain

    As of early April, Spain is moving to establish a permanent universal basic income. No specific date has been announced for its introduction. If passed, this will make Spain the first country in Europe to do introduce the payments truly universal (there have been regional trials in Finland and the Netherlands). While the details remain unclear, the policy framework generally entails regular no-strings-attached cash payments to citizens/residents or households.

    Jobless benefits were increased (including for workers who would not normally qualify), as part of a €200 billion package, equal to 20% of GDP (half of that is loan guarantees for private firms). Workers are granted full pay while self-isolating or caring for family members. The government also announced a one-month moratorium on mortgage payments and utility bill payments (potentially extendable).

    Sweden

    A 300 billion kroner support package (worth about 6% of GDP) contains numerous measures to stabilise employment and incomes.

    A subsidy for work-sharing and covering the costs of short-term layoffs has been significantly increased: the central government will cover 75% of wage costs when hours are reduced, in order to maintain workers’ total income at 90% of initial levels. The government would assume 75% of the cost for the employee’s reduced work hours. The former one-day waiting period before qualifying for sick pay has been eliminated, and the central government will cover the full costs of all sick leave (normally paid by employers) during April and May. Self-employed persons and contractors will also be covered for 14 days of sick pay, also paid by the government.

    Companies can defer payment to government of social security payments, deducted income tax (from workers), and collected GST for up to 3 months, to supplement their cash flow through the crisis. The central bank is directly lending up to another 500 billion kroner (over 10% of GDP) to companies to maintain operations and viability.

    There is also a proposal for temporary reinforcement of the unemployment insurance. More places and more distance learning at higher education institutions have been proposed, as well as more opportunities for vocational education and training throughout the country. It has been proposed that the income ceiling for health and medical students receiving student aid be temporarily removed in order for those students to support the healthcare sector without their student aid being reduced.

    The Government has proposed an extra SEK 1 billion to the cultural sector and sports movement in support due to the economic consequences affecting these sectors as a result of the spread of the COVID-19 virus.

    UK

    Update: In September 2020, the UK Chancellor detailed a different approach to their Wage Subsidy program, which pays 80% of wages and finishes at the end of October. The new Job Support Scheme program will target support to ‘viable’ jobs. It will NOT continue the blanket approach to supporting payroll costs and will exclude workers who are on payroll but not actually working (on layoff or leave or ‘furlough’). The JSS will cover 22% of pay for workers in ‘viable’ jobs for the next 6 months. To qualify, British workers will need to work at least one-third of their normal hours with the employer paying them their normal wages for those hours. Of the remaining two-thirds of the worker’s usual pay, the employer will pay 33 per cent and the government will pay 33 per cent. In total, the government will pay 22 per cent, capped at a maximum £697.72 a month. The employer will pay 55 per cent. 

    In July 2020, the British government put another $30 billion of stimulus into job retention and creation, with the intention of blunting the impact of the expiry of the government’s furlough schemes in October. Seeking to avoid creating a “lost generation” of young workers, the government are offering companies up to £6500 a time for any new jobs they create in coming months aimed at people aged 16 to 24, under a £2 billion “Kickstarter” program. Additionally, businesses would also receive a bonus for any apprenticeship they create, and any apprentice age 25 or over whom they hire.

    In addition to a large program of loan guarantees for businesses (worth some ₤300 billion), the UK government has announced ₤20 billion in direct aid to workers and households affected by workplace disruptions. Specific measures include deferred social security charges, and two months of direct state payments to workers who lose work because of shutdowns. Mandatory sick pay is provided for workers who must self-isolate or care for others, backed by sick pay subsidies to smaller employers. On March 20 the government announced a huge wage support program: it will directly pay the wages (up to ₤2500 per month, just above median income) for workers placed on furlough by employers of any size, in order to keep them on the firms’ payroll. The plan will initially last for 3 months (retroactive to 1 March), and there is no cap on the overall cost of the program. Self-employed workers receive a different stream of benefits: deferral of all tax assessments until January 2021, to be offset by credits equivalent to statutory sick pay received by waged workers.

    USA

    Update: Early in 2021, the US government will send further $600 direct deposits to adults of up to $75,000 annual income, plus another $600 per child. It is expected that there will be a third round of household relief following the commencement of the Biden Administration on 20 January 2021.

    The total package of supports passed 24 March by the US Congress is worth $2 trillion (US), or over 8% of US GDP. That includes $200 billion in secured loans to hard-hit businesses (including airlines). The package direct payments of $1200 to each adult with previous income up to $75,000; and smaller payments for those previously earning between $75,000 and $99,000. Families also receive payments of $500 per child. The federal government will also make special payments to unemployed workers of up to $600 per week – more than doubling the level of unemployment insurance paid by state governments. And a new federal-funded Pandemic Unemployment assistance Program will pay similar benefits to state unemployment benefits for self-employed contractors, gig workers, and others who wouldn’t normally qualify for state UI. Any employer with under 500 employees can receive loans to cover 6 weeks of their payroll costs (up to $1540 per worker), on condition there are no redundancies for at least 8 weeks after receiving the loan. Expanded eligibility to unemployment benefits is provided, backed up by federal aid to the state-run programs. Workers in firms with less than 500 employees are able to take up to 12 weeks of leave for self-isolation or caring for family members, receiving at least two-thirds of their normal pay (up to $200 per day, or $10,000 in total). Income tax filing is deferred by 90 days.


    It is clear that governments around the world are responding to this unprecedented labour market crisis with the urgency and creativity it requires. Policy must be reformed quickly and creatively to address the imperatives of keeping workers healthy, and ensuring that the pandemic does not destroy the livelihoods of millions. Australia’s government must embrace and maintain the same sense of determination.

    Share